>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Syntax

What is fallacy of redundant definition?

The "fallacy of redundant definition" is not a formally recognized fallacy. It's more like a description of a situation where a definition is unnecessary or unhelpful.

Here's what it might look like:

* Example 1: "A bachelor is an unmarried man. An unmarried man is someone who is not married."

* The second sentence simply restates the first, adding no new information.

* Example 2: "A square is a four-sided shape with four right angles. A four-sided shape is a polygon with four sides."

* Again, the second sentence is a more general description that doesn't actually define what makes a square unique.

Why is this potentially problematic?

* Unclear communication: Redundant definitions can make your writing or speech confusing and difficult to follow.

* Lack of depth: It suggests you might not fully understand the concept you're trying to explain.

* Waste of time: Redundant definitions can be boring and make your audience lose interest.

However, sometimes a redundant definition can be helpful:

* Clarification: If you're explaining a complex concept to a beginner, repeating a definition in different words can make it clearer.

* Emphasis: Repeating a key definition can help emphasize its importance.

It's best to think about your audience and the purpose of your communication when deciding whether to use a redundant definition.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.