>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Syntax

Is comma required after the word formerly?

Whether you need a comma after "formerly" depends on the context and the structure of the sentence. Here's a breakdown:

1. When "formerly" acts as an adjective:

* No comma needed: If "formerly" modifies a noun directly, you don't need a comma.

* Example: "The formerly bustling market is now quiet."

* Comma optional: If "formerly" modifies a noun with additional descriptive words, a comma can be used for clarity.

* Example: "The formerly bustling, vibrant market is now quiet."

2. When "formerly" introduces a phrase:

* Comma needed: If "formerly" introduces a phrase that provides additional information about a noun, you need a comma.

* Example: "The market, formerly bustling, is now quiet."

3. When "formerly" is part of a parenthetical phrase:

* Commas needed: If "formerly" is part of a parenthetical phrase that provides non-essential information, you need commas before and after the phrase.

* Example: "The market, formerly known as 'The Grand Bazaar,' is now quiet."

In summary:

* A comma is generally required after "formerly" if it introduces a phrase or is part of a parenthetical phrase.

* A comma is optional if "formerly" directly modifies a noun with additional descriptive words.

* A comma is not needed if "formerly" directly modifies a noun without additional descriptive words.

Example Sentences:

* No comma: The formerly prosperous town is now struggling.

* Comma optional: The formerly bustling, lively market is now quiet.

* Comma needed: The market, formerly bustling with shoppers, is now quiet.

* Commas needed: The market, formerly known as "The Grand Bazaar," is now quiet.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.