Why it's tricky:
* Subjectivity: "Funny" is highly subjective. What one person finds hilarious, another might find dull.
* Different types of humor: There are many kinds of humor (witty, silly, sarcastic, etc.). A superlative might not capture the specific type of humor you want to emphasize.
Possible options:
* Most hilarious: This is the most straightforward option, but it can sound a bit generic.
* Most side-splitting: This emphasizes the physical reaction of laughter.
* Most uproarious: This suggests a loud and boisterous kind of humor.
* Most ingeniously witty: Emphasizes cleverness and wordplay.
* Most laugh-out-loud: A more informal option that emphasizes the loudness of laughter.
Example usage:
* "That comedian was the most hilarious I've ever seen!"
* "The play was the most side-splitting production I've ever attended."
* "Her jokes were the most ingeniously witty I've ever heard."
Ultimately, the best comparative superlative depends on the specific context and what you want to emphasize about the humor.