>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Syntax

When should you paraphrase information instead of using direct quote?

You should paraphrase information instead of using a direct quote when:

1. The original wording is overly complex or jargon-filled:

* Example: "The data suggests a statistically significant positive correlation between the two variables, with a p-value of 0.03."

* Paraphrased: "The research shows a strong link between the two factors."

2. The original wording is too long or distracting:

* Example: "The government's new policy on education is based on the premise that all children are capable of achieving success if given the right resources and support."

* Paraphrased: "The new education policy aims to provide equal opportunities for all students."

3. You need to integrate the information seamlessly into your own writing:

* Example: "According to Smith (2023), 'The impact of climate change is undeniable.'"

* Paraphrased: "Smith (2023) argues that climate change has had a significant impact."

4. You want to avoid plagiarism:

* Example: "The American Revolution was a pivotal moment in American history."

* Paraphrased: "The fight for independence in the late 18th century transformed the American colonies."

5. You want to explain the information in your own words to enhance understanding:

* Example: "The study found that 80% of participants reported experiencing anxiety symptoms."

* Paraphrased: "A majority of participants reported feeling anxious."

Important Note: Always cite the source of the information, even when you paraphrase.

Here are some exceptions where direct quotes are preferred:

* When the original wording is particularly eloquent or memorable.

* When the source is an authority on the topic and their exact words are important.

* When you need to analyze the specific language used in the source.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to quote directly or paraphrase depends on the context and your purpose.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.