What type of claim dose an argument interpretation make?

An argument interpretation makes a claim about the meaning of an argument. It's not claiming that the argument is true or false, but rather explaining what the author is trying to say and how they are trying to persuade their audience.

Here's a breakdown of the types of claims an argument interpretation might make:

* Claim about the argument's main point: This is the central claim or conclusion the author is trying to establish. For example, "The author argues that social media has a negative impact on mental health."

* Claim about the argument's premises: These are the reasons or evidence the author uses to support their main point. For example, "The author uses statistics about increased anxiety and depression rates among social media users to support their argument."

* Claim about the argument's structure: This describes how the premises are organized and how they relate to the main point. For example, "The author uses a deductive structure, starting with general principles about social media and then applying those principles to the specific case of mental health."

* Claim about the argument's rhetorical strategy: This examines the techniques the author uses to persuade their audience. For example, "The author uses emotional appeals to connect with the reader's personal experience with social media."

* Claim about the argument's intended audience: This identifies who the author is trying to reach with their argument. For example, "The author is writing for a general audience who may be unfamiliar with the complexities of social media's effects."

Important Note: Argument interpretations are subjective, meaning different people may interpret the same argument in slightly different ways. There's no single "right" interpretation, but there are stronger and weaker interpretations depending on the evidence and reasoning presented.