>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Semantics

Semantics Every expression that has meaning sense but not every reference EXPLAIN?

You're touching on a key distinction in semantics: the difference between sense and reference. Let's break it down:

Sense:

* The conceptual content of an expression. It's the internal, mental representation of the meaning.

* Think of it like a definition or a description.

* Example: The sense of "the current president of the United States" is something like "the person who holds the highest elected office in the United States government."

Reference:

* The actual thing in the world that an expression points to. It's the external, concrete entity.

* Example: The reference of "the current president of the United States" is currently Joe Biden.

Why Not Every Expression Has Reference:

* Abstract concepts: Expressions referring to abstract ideas, like "justice," "love," or "infinity," don't have a specific, concrete reference.

* Fictional entities: Characters in stories or myths, like "Sherlock Holmes," have a sense (a description of their personality and traits) but don't actually exist in the real world.

* Future or hypothetical things: Sentences like "The next president of the United States" have a sense but the reference is unknown until that person is elected.

* Propositions: Sentences like "All cats are mammals" express a truth, but they don't refer to any particular cat or mammal.

Key takeaway:

An expression can have a clear sense (meaning) without having a definite reference (real-world thing). This is because sense is about the conceptual content, while reference is about the actual thing being pointed to.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.