Here's a breakdown:
First Intention:
* Refers to terms that signify things directly. These terms directly represent objects, properties, or relationships in the real world.
* Examples: "tree," "red," "bigger than."
* These terms are used in making statements about the world, like "The tree is red."
Second Intention:
* Refers to terms that signify things indirectly, specifically terms that signify concepts, propositions, or other mental constructs.
* Examples: "concept," "truth," "falsehood," "universal," "particular."
* These terms are used to talk about the way we understand and reason about the world, rather than the world itself. For example, "The concept of a tree is a universal."
In simpler terms:
* First intention is about the world itself.
* Second intention is about our understanding of the world.
Why are these concepts important?
* They help to distinguish between different levels of language. We use different words and concepts to talk about the world (first intention) and to talk about our own thought processes (second intention).
* They highlight the distinction between real things and our concepts of them. A tree exists in the world, while our understanding of a tree is a mental construct.
Modern Usage:
While the terms "first intention" and "second intention" are not commonly used in contemporary logic, the concepts they represent are still relevant:
* Modern logic uses formal languages to represent the world. These languages have symbols that correspond to objects, properties, and relationships (similar to first intention).
* Meta-logic studies the properties of formal languages themselves. This involves talking about concepts like truth, validity, and provability, which are analogous to second intention.
Overall:
While the terms "first intention" and "second intention" are primarily historical, they offer a useful framework for understanding how we use language to represent both the world and our own minds.