>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Semantics

What is the word that describes arguing for arguings sake?

There isn't one single perfect word, but here are some options depending on the specific nuance you want to convey:

Formal:

* Eristic: This is the most precise term, referring to argumentation for the sake of victory, often without regard for truth or logic.

* Polemical: This implies a strong, often aggressive and contentious argument.

* Contentious: This emphasizes a tendency to argue or disagree, often unnecessarily.

Informal:

* Quibbling: This suggests arguing about minor details or unimportant points.

* Nitpicking: Similar to quibbling, but focusing on finding faults or flaws in an argument.

* Hairsplitting: This refers to making very fine distinctions and arguing over minute details.

* Pointless: This simply means the argument has no real value or purpose.

* Futile: This implies the argument is likely to be unproductive or unsuccessful.

The best word to use will depend on the context and the specific nature of the argument.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.