* Inductive arguments move from specific observations to a general conclusion. They aim to draw inferences about a larger population based on a limited sample.
* Hasty generalizations occur when the sample size is too small or not representative, leading to a conclusion that doesn't accurately reflect the whole population.
Example:
* Observation: You see three people in a store wearing red shirts.
* Hasty generalization: All people in the store are wearing red shirts.
This is an example of an inductive argument that relies on a small and potentially biased sample.
In contrast, deductive arguments move from general statements to specific conclusions. They are generally considered more reliable because they rely on established premises.
Key takeaway: While both inductive and deductive arguments have their place, hasty generalizations are a common fallacy associated with inductive reasoning.