>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Theoretical Linguistics >> Pragmatics

What is non naturalism?

"Non-naturalism" is a term used in philosophy, particularly in the context of ethics and metaphysics. It refers to the idea that moral properties or facts are not reducible to natural properties or facts. This stands in contrast to naturalism, which holds that everything in the universe, including morality, is ultimately explained by natural laws and processes.

Here's a breakdown:

Naturalism:

* Everything that exists, including moral values, can be explained by science and natural processes.

* Moral properties are ultimately based on natural properties, like pleasure, happiness, or well-being.

* Morality is objective and grounded in the natural world.

Non-naturalism:

* Moral properties or facts are fundamentally different from natural properties or facts.

* There is a "moral realm" separate from the physical world.

* Morality cannot be reduced to scientific or natural explanations.

* Morality might be objective, but it doesn't derive from natural facts.

Key Arguments for Non-naturalism:

* Moral Motivation: Naturalism struggles to explain why we feel obligated to act morally, as natural properties alone don't seem to motivate us.

* Moral Intuitions: Non-naturalists argue that our moral intuitions are evidence for a separate moral realm that cannot be explained by natural properties.

* Open Question Argument: This argument states that even if we define a moral property in natural terms (like "pleasure"), the question of whether it's *good* remains unanswered.

Examples of Non-naturalist Theories:

* Moral Realism: There are objective moral facts that exist independently of human perception.

* Moral Intuitionism: We have direct access to moral truths through intuition.

* Deontology: Moral duties are based on principles that are not reducible to natural properties.

Criticisms of Non-naturalism:

* Lack of Empirical Evidence: Non-naturalism is difficult to prove or disprove empirically.

* The "Ghost in the Machine" Problem: Some critics argue that it's unclear how a separate moral realm could interact with the physical world.

* Problems with Moral Intuition: Intuitions can be subjective and unreliable.

In Conclusion:

Non-naturalism offers a different perspective on morality, suggesting that moral properties are not merely a reflection of the natural world. It raises profound questions about the nature of reality and the meaning of moral values. Whether or not non-naturalism is ultimately true is a matter of ongoing debate in philosophy.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.