Could pseudopseudopseudosupernaturalization be a real word because it is made by adding prefixes and suffixes to the base natural?

While it's true that "pseudopseudopseudosupernaturalization" is formed by adding prefixes and suffixes to "natural", it's highly unlikely to be considered a real word in standard English. Here's why:

* Meaning: The word is so convoluted and nonsensical that it wouldn't convey any clear meaning, even if its parts were individually understandable.

* Usage: It's extremely unlikely that anyone would ever use this word in a serious context. It's more likely to be a humorous or nonsensical creation.

* Dictionaries: While English is constantly evolving, words need to be established through widespread usage and recognition before they are added to dictionaries.

In short, "pseudopseudopseudosupernaturalization" is a playful combination of words, but it's unlikely to be considered a "real" word in the English language.