Similarities:
* Goal of Philippine Independence: Both acts were aimed at granting the Philippines eventual independence from the United States. They were the result of growing Filipino nationalist sentiment and pressure on the US government to grant self-governance.
* Gradual Transition to Independence: Neither act granted immediate independence. Both stipulated a transition period, with the Philippines gaining increasing autonomy before achieving full independence.
* Economic Provisions: Both acts included provisions related to the economic relationship between the US and the Philippines. They established a period of free trade between the two countries, which aimed to ensure economic stability for the Philippines during the transition to independence.
* Opposition from some Filipinos: Both acts faced opposition from some Filipinos who felt the transition was too slow or that the economic provisions were unfair.
* Filipino Acceptance: Despite the opposition, both acts were eventually accepted by the Philippines as the path to independence.
Differences:
It's important to note that the two acts also had significant differences:
* Timeline: The Hare-Hawes Cutting Act offered independence after a 10-year transition period, while the Tydings-McDuffie Act extended this period to 12 years.
* Approval: The Hare-Hawes Cutting Act was initially passed by the US Congress but was rejected by the Philippine legislature. The Tydings-McDuffie Act was ultimately accepted by both the US Congress and the Philippine legislature.
* Economic Provisions: The two acts differed in their specifics regarding trade and economic relations.
In conclusion, the Tydings-McDuffie Act and the Hare-Hawes Cutting Act shared a common goal of Philippine independence, but differed in their details regarding the transition period, economic provisions, and their acceptance by the Filipino people.