>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Linguistic Research >> Academic Journals

Does it sound good in book to write Theoretical Framework for Study instead of Literature Review?

It's not accurate to say "Theoretical Framework for Study" instead of "Literature Review." They serve different purposes. Here's why:

* Literature Review: This section summarizes existing research on your topic. It analyzes previous studies, identifies gaps in knowledge, and establishes the foundation for your own research.

* Theoretical Framework: This section explains the theories and concepts that underpin your research. It clarifies the lens through which you are approaching your study and provides a structure for interpreting your findings.

Think of it this way:

* Literature Review: The building materials (existing research).

* Theoretical Framework: The blueprint (theories and concepts that guide your study).

You need both:

* A strong literature review demonstrates your understanding of the existing research and helps you identify your own contribution.

* A robust theoretical framework clarifies your research approach and provides a framework for interpreting your findings.

How to integrate both:

Instead of replacing "Literature Review," you can integrate the elements of a theoretical framework within your literature review. For example:

* Discuss relevant theories: As you discuss previous research, highlight the theories that inform the study and explain how they connect to your research question.

* Define key concepts: Clearly define the key concepts that underpin your study, drawing on existing theoretical frameworks.

* Develop your own framework: Based on your analysis of existing research, you might develop a unique theoretical framework to guide your own study.

Remember, the specific organization of your paper will depend on your field and the requirements of your research.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.