How do you prove sanskrit as the mother of all languages?

The claim that Sanskrit is the "mother of all languages" is a controversial and unsupported hypothesis. While Sanskrit has played a significant role in the development of many languages, particularly in South Asia, it is not universally accepted as the origin of all languages.

Here's why:

* Linguistic evidence: The Indo-European language family, which includes Sanskrit, has been traced back to a proto-language known as Proto-Indo-European. However, Proto-Indo-European is not the origin of all languages. There are numerous other language families around the world, each with its own unique origins.

* No scientific consensus: Linguists generally reject the idea of a single "mother" language for all languages. The study of language evolution points to multiple independent origins and complex interrelationships between language families.

* Historical context: While Sanskrit has been influential in South Asia, its influence on other language families is limited. It is important to acknowledge the diversity of languages and the contributions of different cultures and languages throughout history.

Instead of focusing on a single "mother" language, it's more accurate to consider:

* The interconnectedness of language families: Languages share similarities and relationships through historical connections and shared linguistic features.

* The evolution of languages: Languages change and develop over time, influenced by contact with other languages, migration, and cultural factors.

* The diversity of languages: There are thousands of languages spoken around the world, each with its own unique history and significance.

While Sanskrit holds a respected place in history and culture, claiming it as the "mother of all languages" simplifies the complex reality of language origins and overlooks the contributions of other languages and cultures.