In what way does the scene in wagon between Meir an meirs father contrast to relationship of elie and his father?

You're referring to the powerful scenes in Elie Wiesel's *Night* where the relationship between Eliezer and his father is contrasted with the relationship between Meir and his father in the same train car. Here's how these relationships differ:

Meir and his father:

* Overbearing and controlling: Meir's father is a domineering presence, constantly criticizing and belittling his son. He views Meir as weak and incompetent, often shouting at him and making him feel inadequate.

* Fear and obedience: Meir is deeply afraid of his father, and his primary response to his father's abuse is to submit and obey. He seems to lack the courage to stand up for himself or challenge his father's authority.

* Lack of emotional connection: There is little evidence of any genuine affection or love between Meir and his father. Their relationship is primarily one of power and dominance, with very little emotional depth.

Eliezer and his father:

* Protective and supportive: Eliezer's father, Shlomo, is a source of strength and comfort for him. He tries his best to shield Eliezer from the horrors of the camp, even when his own body is failing.

* Mutual reliance: Eliezer deeply cares for his father and wants to protect him. He struggles with guilt and shame when he sees his father weaken, and feels responsible for his well-being.

* Deeply loving bond: Despite the hardships they face, Eliezer and his father share a powerful bond of love and loyalty. They are each other's anchor in the face of unimaginable suffering.

The Contrast:

The contrast between these two relationships highlights the different ways in which fathers and sons interact during times of great hardship. Meir's father embodies a toxic, abusive relationship built on fear and control. This ultimately leads to Meir's breakdown and death in the camp, further emphasizing the detrimental impact of such dynamics.

Eliezer and his father's relationship, however, exemplifies the power of love and compassion in the face of immense suffering. Their bond provides strength and resilience in the face of adversity, reminding us that even in the darkest of times, love and connection can sustain us.

Significance:

By contrasting these two relationships, Wiesel emphasizes the importance of healthy father-son relationships, particularly in the context of extreme hardship. He suggests that a relationship built on mutual respect, love, and support can provide a lifeline in the face of adversity, while relationships built on fear and control can lead to destruction and despair.