Why did rizal wrote One who does not treasure his own language is worse than a beast and putrid fish?

While Jose Rizal never explicitly wrote the exact phrase "One who does not treasure his own language is worse than a beast and putrid fish," it's likely a shortened and simplified version of a broader sentiment expressed in his writings and speeches. Here's why he might have felt this way:

* Language as Identity: Rizal believed language was the soul of a nation, embodying its culture, history, and identity. Losing one's language was like losing a part of oneself, making it difficult to connect with one's heritage and history.

* Cultural Preservation: He saw the suppression of the Filipino language by the Spanish colonizers as an attempt to erase Filipino culture and identity. He saw the importance of preserving the language as a way to resist assimilation and maintain cultural independence.

* Empowerment through Language: Rizal believed that a people who control their language are empowered to express themselves, to think critically, and to participate actively in their own governance. Without language, they become voiceless and vulnerable.

Connecting the Sentiment to Rizal's Works:

While the specific quote may not be found verbatim in his works, this sentiment is reflected in many of his writings and speeches. For instance:

* "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo": Both novels showcase the struggles of Filipinos under Spanish rule, highlighting the suppression of their language and culture.

* "Mi Ultimo Adios": In this poem, Rizal laments the loss of his homeland and expresses his love for his people, indirectly implying the importance of language in national identity.

* Speeches and Writings: He frequently advocated for the use and development of the Tagalog language, seeing it as a tool for national unity and cultural expression.

In conclusion: While the specific quote may be a simplified version of Rizal's ideas, it captures the essence of his strong belief in the importance of language in national identity, cultural preservation, and individual empowerment. He viewed the loss of one's language as a significant loss of self, culture, and freedom.