* Alternative definitions of intelligence: They may criticize definitions that include emotional intelligence, practical intelligence, or creative intelligence, arguing that these are not "real" intelligence.
* Measures of intelligence other than standardized tests: They may dismiss things like IQ tests as inaccurate or insufficient measures of intelligence, arguing that only academic performance truly reflects intellectual ability.
* The impact of socio-economic factors on academic achievement: They may downplay the role of factors like poverty, access to resources, and educational opportunities in influencing academic success, focusing instead on innate ability.
* The diversity of human abilities and talents: They may fail to recognize that people have different strengths and weaknesses, and that academic intelligence is just one facet of a complex human being.
* The emphasis on standardized testing: They may criticize the over-reliance on standardized tests as the sole measure of intelligence, arguing that it can lead to a narrow focus on rote learning and memorization, while neglecting other important skills and knowledge.
Essentially, those who define intelligence narrowly as academic aptitude often fail to see the full picture of human intelligence and its complexities. They may be critical of any approach that challenges their limited view.