Arguments for language being equally important to knowledge:
* Language as a tool for organizing and communicating knowledge: Language allows us to name, categorize, and relate concepts, making it easier to store, retrieve, and share knowledge. Without language, our understanding of the world would be limited to our immediate sensory experiences.
* Language as a foundation for thought: Many theories argue that language shapes our thinking. The structure of our language influences how we perceive and process information. For example, the existence of different grammatical tenses in a language can influence our understanding of time.
* Language as a tool for collaboration and learning: Language allows us to communicate ideas, ask questions, and engage in discussions, all of which are crucial for learning and advancing our understanding of the world.
Arguments for knowledge being more important than language:
* Knowledge is the basis for language: Language is a tool for expressing and communicating knowledge. Without knowledge, language would be meaningless.
* Knowledge exists independently of language: While language may be important for organizing and communicating knowledge, the knowledge itself exists independently. We can have knowledge without language (consider babies and animals).
* Other forms of communication exist: While language is a powerful tool, it's not the only form of communication. We can also communicate through gestures, visual art, and music.
Conclusion:
Ultimately, language and knowledge are intertwined. Language is a crucial tool for acquiring, organizing, and sharing knowledge, but knowledge itself exists independently of language. It's difficult to say definitively which is more important, as they are both essential for human understanding and development.
It's more accurate to say that language and knowledge are mutually dependent and work together to shape our understanding of the world.