Here's why:
* Subjectivity: Drawings are inherently subjective. The interpretation of a drawing can vary widely depending on the individual's cultural background, personal experiences, and knowledge.
* Lack of Standardization: Unlike languages, there is no universal grammar or set of symbols for drawings. Different artists use different styles and techniques, leading to potential ambiguity and misinterpretation.
* Context Dependence: The meaning of a drawing often depends heavily on its context. A drawing of a stick figure with a frown might mean sadness, anger, or even hunger depending on the surrounding information.
However, drawing can be considered a powerful tool for communication:
* Visual Language: Drawing can be a very effective way to communicate visually, bypassing language barriers.
* Global Understanding: Basic symbols and depictions can be understood across cultures, especially in situations where spoken communication is difficult.
* Expressiveness: Drawing can convey complex emotions, ideas, and stories in ways that words sometimes cannot.
Conclusion:
Drawing is not a universal language in the same way as spoken or written languages. However, it can be a valuable tool for communication, particularly in bridging cultural and language gaps. Its effectiveness is dependent on the context and the ability of the viewer to interpret the drawing based on their own experiences and knowledge.