* Filipino is a relatively modern language. It developed from Tagalog, one of the major languages in the Philippines, and was officially declared the national language in 1937. It's a living language with constant evolution, not something that needs to be reconstructed from historical data.
* Linguistic reconstruction usually focuses on extinct languages. Linguists use comparative methods to reconstruct the hypothetical ancestor of related languages, often working with ancient texts or fragments. Filipino isn't in that category.
* There are movements to standardize Filipino. Efforts exist to refine Filipino grammar and vocabulary, perhaps to increase its use in formal settings and education. These can be seen as "reconstructions" in a sense, as they aim to create a more uniform and accessible language. However, they are more accurately described as language planning or standardization efforts.
What might be meant by "reconstruction of the Filipino language"?
It's possible the term is used to refer to:
* Efforts to revitalize or strengthen regional languages: Some indigenous languages in the Philippines are threatened by the dominance of Filipino. There might be initiatives to revitalize these languages, which could be described as "reconstructing" them in terms of bringing them back into active use.
* Attempts to create a unified national language: The Philippines has over 100 languages, and some believe a single, unified national language would foster greater national unity. This effort would involve taking elements from different languages and creating a new, standardized system, which might be called "reconstructing" a national language.
In summary:
The term "reconstruction of the Filipino language" is not a commonly used or accurate term in linguistics. It likely refers to ongoing efforts to standardize Filipino or to revitalize regional languages.