Shang Writing System:
* Logographic: Each character represented a word or concept, rather than a single sound.
* Complex Characters: Many characters were complex, often composed of multiple strokes and parts that represented different elements of the word's meaning.
* Limited Phonetic Clues: While some characters hinted at pronunciation, the primary focus was on conveying meaning.
* Evolutionary: The script evolved over centuries, with new characters being created and existing ones being modified.
* Limited Use: Initially used for divination and official records, it was primarily a system for the elite.
Modern Alphabet:
* Alphabetic: Each letter represents a single sound, allowing for a more flexible and systematic representation of language.
* Simple Characters: Letters are typically composed of a few strokes, making them easier to learn and write.
* Strong Phonetic Value: Letters directly represent sounds, making it easier to decode words.
* Universal: Used widely around the world, allowing for communication across language barriers.
* Accessible: More accessible to the general population due to its relative simplicity.
Key Differences:
* Mode of Representation: Logographic vs. alphabetic.
* Complexity of Characters: Complex vs. simple.
* Phonetic Value: Limited vs. strong.
* Accessibility: Limited vs. widespread.
Analogy:
Think of the Shang writing system like a set of intricate pictures representing ideas, while our modern alphabet is like a set of building blocks that can be combined to create different sounds.
In summary: The Shang writing system was a complex, meaning-focused system, while our modern alphabet is a simpler, sound-based system, making it much more efficient and accessible.