Here's why this concept is problematic:
* Tamil has always been an independent language: Tamil has a rich and long history, predating Sanskrit by centuries. It has evolved independently, with its own unique grammar, vocabulary, and literature.
* Influence, not imposition: While there has been interaction and influence between Tamil and Sanskrit throughout history, it's important to understand that this was a two-way process. Tamil has borrowed words from Sanskrit, just as Sanskrit has borrowed words from Tamil.
* Aryanization implies a "superior" language: The term itself perpetuates the idea of a "superior" language (Sanskrit) and an "inferior" one (Tamil). This is a discriminatory and inaccurate understanding of language and cultural history.
Instead of using the term "Aryanization," it's more accurate to talk about:
* Sanskritization: This term acknowledges the influence of Sanskrit on Tamil, but avoids the problematic implications of "Aryanization."
* Linguistic borrowing: This term emphasizes the natural process of languages borrowing words and concepts from each other, which is common throughout history.
It's important to avoid using terms like "Aryanization" that are based on outdated and harmful ideologies.