Here's why it's tricky:
* No written records for the earliest languages: Many of the oldest languages existed long before writing was invented. We can only speculate about their structure and origins based on limited archaeological and linguistic evidence.
* Language families are interconnected: Languages within a family are related, sharing common ancestors. It's difficult to pinpoint a single "second oldest" when languages within a family are all descended from a shared parent language.
* Continuous evolution: Languages change over time. What we consider "ancient" languages may have evolved significantly from their earlier forms.
Instead of focusing on "oldest," it's more accurate to consider:
* Language families: Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan, Afro-Asiatic, and others represent significant groupings with ancient origins.
* Ancient languages with known records: Sanskrit, Ancient Egyptian, Sumerian, and Akkadian are examples of languages with extensive written records dating back thousands of years.
Ultimately, there isn't a clear-cut answer to the question of the "second oldest" language. It's a fascinating area of study, but the complexities of language evolution make definitive rankings challenging.