>> ZG·Lingua >  >> Language and Culture >> Cultural Linguistics

Is deviance always defined in the same way regardless of historical cultural or situational context?

No, deviance is not always defined in the same way regardless of historical, cultural, or situational context.

Here's why:

* Deviance is relative: What is considered deviant in one culture or time period may not be in another. For example, wearing a bikini on the beach is considered normal in many Western cultures, but might be seen as deviant in some other parts of the world.

* Social norms change: What is considered deviant can change over time. For example, smoking cigarettes was once considered normal, but is now widely seen as deviant in many societies.

* Context matters: Deviance is often judged based on the specific situation or context. For example, wearing a clown costume to a birthday party is acceptable, but wearing it to a funeral would be considered highly deviant.

* Power and social control: Definitions of deviance are often influenced by those in power. Those with more power can define what is considered deviant and impose sanctions on those who violate those norms.

Examples:

* Homosexuality: Throughout history, homosexuality has been considered deviant in many societies, but this perception has changed significantly in recent decades, particularly in Western countries.

* Polygamy: In some cultures, polygamy is accepted, while in others it is illegal.

* Tattoos and piercings: These were once considered deviant in many societies, but are now becoming more mainstream.

Therefore, it's crucial to understand that deviance is a social construct that varies significantly based on the specific historical, cultural, and situational context.

Copyright © www.zgghmh.com ZG·Lingua All rights reserved.