Important note: This term can be sensitive and potentially offensive.
Here's why:
* It implies a lack of intelligence or ability: Being non-literate doesn't mean someone is less intelligent or capable. There are many reasons why someone might not be literate, including lack of access to education, cultural practices, or disability.
* It can be stigmatizing: It's crucial to be respectful and avoid using language that could be demeaning or hurtful.
Instead of "non-literate," consider using more respectful and specific language, such as:
* Illiterate: This is a more neutral term, though it can still be considered outdated by some.
* Functionally illiterate: This describes someone who has limited reading and writing skills, even if they have received some formal education.
* Non-reading: This term focuses on the specific skill of reading, avoiding judgments about intelligence or ability.
* Limited literacy: This phrase acknowledges the individual's skills and avoids placing them in a binary category of literate or non-literate.
Ultimately, it's important to be mindful of the language you use and choose terms that are respectful and accurate.