Here's how it works:
* Logical Appeal: The author presents data about population growth to support the argument that overpopulation is a significant problem. This data is intended to be objectively true and persuasive based on its factual nature.
* Creating a Premise: The statistics are used to establish the premise that there are limited resources and that helping the poor will only exacerbate the problem of scarcity. This creates a logical connection between population growth and the justification for not helping the poor.
* Strengthening the Argument: By presenting these facts, the author attempts to bolster their argument by making it seem more objective and grounded in reality. They use statistics as evidence to support their claim that resources are finite and that we should prioritize the well-being of the "lifeboat" occupants (the developed world).
However, it's important to note:
* Selectivity: The author might choose to present only statistics that support their viewpoint, ignoring data that could contradict their argument.
* Misinterpretation: Statistics can be misinterpreted or used to draw conclusions that are not necessarily supported by the data itself.
* Ethical Concerns: The use of facts and statistics can mask the underlying ethical implications of the argument. The argument may neglect the moral imperative to help those in need, even in the face of limited resources.
In summary, the author of "Lifeboat Ethics" employs logos by using facts and statistics to present a seemingly logical argument. However, the effectiveness of this strategy can be debated, as it can be used to manipulate and distort the true picture of the issue.