CLT vs. Traditional Grammar-Translation:
* Traditional Focus: Emphasis on memorizing grammar rules and translating texts.
* CLT Focus: Focus on meaningful communication in authentic contexts.
* Example: Traditional method might have students translate a passage from English to French. CLT would have students role-play a scenario at a French restaurant.
CLT vs. Audio-Lingual Method:
* Audio-Lingual Focus: Emphasis on drilling dialogues and practicing grammatical structures.
* CLT Focus: Emphasis on using language spontaneously and creatively to communicate.
* Example: Audio-lingual method might have students repeat a dialogue about ordering food. CLT would encourage students to use their own words to order something different in a simulated restaurant setting.
CLT vs. Direct Method:
* Direct Method Focus: Emphasis on using the target language exclusively and avoiding translation.
* CLT Focus: Focus on using the language for communicative purposes, even if it requires occasional translation or explanation.
* Example: Direct method might have students learn vocabulary through actions and objects in the classroom. CLT might use these objects to create dialogues or stories.
Key Features of CLT:
* Authentic materials: Using real-world texts, videos, and audio to make learning relevant.
* Learner-centered: Focusing on student needs and interests to motivate engagement.
* Task-based activities: Creating scenarios that require students to use language to achieve a specific goal.
* Collaboration and interaction: Encouraging students to work together and communicate with each other.
* Focus on fluency: Prioritizing effective communication over perfect grammatical accuracy.
In short:
* Traditional methods: Focus on mastering rules and structures.
* CLT: Focus on using language to achieve communication goals in meaningful situations.
Benefits of CLT:
* More engaging and motivating for students.
* Develops fluency and confidence in communication.
* Prepares learners for real-world language use.
Limitations of CLT:
* Requires careful planning and skilled teachers.
* May not provide enough explicit grammar instruction for some learners.
* Can be challenging to assess progress effectively.