1. The "Thought First" Argument
* Cognitive Science: This perspective argues that thought processes are fundamental and precede language. Our brains are capable of complex reasoning, problem-solving, and emotional responses independent of language.
* Animal Cognition: We observe complex cognitive abilities in animals that lack human language, including tool use, problem-solving, and social interactions. This suggests that cognition can exist without language.
* Early Human Development: Infants demonstrate complex cognitive abilities (object permanence, memory) before they develop language.
2. The "Language First" Argument
* Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis): This theory suggests that language structures our thoughts and perceptions. The way we categorize and label the world shapes our understanding of it.
* Language as a Tool for Thought: Language can be seen as a tool that helps us organize, express, and refine our thoughts. It allows us to communicate with others and share complex ideas.
3. The "Intertwined" Perspective
* Most Likely View: The most likely scenario is that thought and language are not separate but rather intertwined and mutually influence each other.
* Dynamic Interaction: Language facilitates thought by providing structure, symbols, and concepts. Thought, in turn, drives language development and shapes its evolution.
Therefore, there is no definitive answer. The question of which comes first is a philosophical debate. It's more accurate to say that thought and language co-evolve and influence each other in a complex and dynamic relationship.