The statement Improving the intelligence of an adult through education will result in that descendants being born with a greater native is example of?

The statement "Improving the intelligence of an adult through education will result in that descendants being born with a greater native intelligence" is an example of Lamarckism.

Here's why:

* Lamarckism: This theory, proposed by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, suggests that acquired characteristics during an organism's lifetime can be passed on to their offspring. In this case, the statement implies that the increased intelligence gained through education is a acquired characteristic that gets passed down genetically.

Why this statement is incorrect:

* Modern Genetics: Modern genetics has disproven Lamarckism. We now understand that traits are passed down through genes, and acquired characteristics (like knowledge gained through education) do not alter the genetic makeup of an individual.

In other words, you cannot inherit intelligence from your parents based on their education. Intelligence is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors.