Here's why:
Primary Source:
* If the interviewee is the subject of the research: The interview is a primary source because it provides firsthand information directly from the person being studied. For example, interviewing a historical figure about their experiences would be a primary source.
* If the interviewee witnessed an event: An interview with someone who witnessed a particular event firsthand can be considered a primary source. For example, interviewing someone who saw a crime being committed.
Secondary Source:
* If the interviewee is discussing someone else's experiences: The interview is a secondary source because it provides secondhand information. For example, interviewing a historian about a historical figure would be a secondary source, as the historian is relaying information they learned from other sources.
* If the interviewee is expressing an opinion or interpretation: The interview can be considered a secondary source if it's about the interviewee's perspective, analysis, or interpretation of a topic, rather than their direct experience. For example, interviewing a critic about a movie.
Ultimately, whether an interview is a primary or secondary source depends on the specific purpose and context of the research.