However, it's likely that the term is a synonym or close variant of other persuasive techniques that play on logic and perception. Here are some rhetorical devices that could be considered "slanters" depending on the context:
* Loaded language: Using words with strong emotional connotations to sway the audience's opinion, even if the information presented is factually accurate. For example, "The government is spending your tax dollars on wasteful programs" uses the emotionally charged word "wasteful" to imply inefficiency and justify a particular viewpoint.
* Euphemisms: Using milder or less offensive terms to describe something unpleasant or controversial. For example, "collateral damage" instead of "civilian casualties" can soften the impact of the information.
* Dysphemisms: Using harsher or more negative language to describe something, often with the intention of discrediting or demonizing the subject. For example, calling a political opponent "a radical" or "a socialist" without providing specific evidence can be considered a dysphemism.
* Weasel words: Using vague or ambiguous language to avoid making a clear statement or taking responsibility. For example, "some people believe that..." or "it is widely known that..." can be used to avoid directly stating an opinion or providing evidence.
To understand the specific meaning of "slanter" in your context, it would be helpful to provide more information about where you encountered the term and the specific situation it is being used to describe.
It's important to be aware of these rhetorical techniques and their potential impact on our understanding of information. By critically evaluating the language used, we can better discern the true intent behind a message.