Here are some ways to think about "non-credible":
* Lack of Evidence: A non-credible source or claim might not have any evidence to support it, or the evidence might be weak or unreliable.
* Bias or Motivation: The person or source making the claim might have a hidden agenda or bias that makes their information unreliable.
* Inconsistency: A non-credible source might contradict itself or make claims that are incompatible with known facts.
* Lack of Expertise: Someone claiming to be an expert in a field might not actually have the knowledge or experience to be credible.
Examples of non-credible sources:
* Gossip: Unverified information spread by word of mouth.
* Unreliable Websites: Websites that are known for spreading misinformation or propaganda.
* People with a vested interest: Someone who stands to gain financially or politically from a particular claim.
The opposite of non-credible is "credible," which means believable, trustworthy, and reliable.