Why Trial called an absurd fiction?

The idea of a "trial" being called an "absurd fiction" is a statement that likely arises from a specific context or argument. It's important to understand the context to provide an accurate answer.

Here are some possible interpretations:

* Critique of the legal system: Someone might call a trial an absurd fiction if they believe the legal system is fundamentally flawed and doesn't serve justice. They might argue that trials are often biased, influenced by power dynamics, or unable to truly uncover the truth.

* Specific case analysis: In a specific case, the trial might be considered absurd if there's a clear lack of evidence, blatant manipulation, or a complete disregard for the legal process.

* Literary or philosophical argument: A writer or philosopher might use the term "absurd fiction" to highlight the absurdity of human justice, the limitations of human reason, or the inherent unfairness of life.

To provide a more accurate answer, please provide the following:

* Who made the statement? Knowing the speaker's background and beliefs can help understand their intended meaning.

* What specific trial are they referring to? Is it a general critique of trials, or a critique of a particular case?

* What is the broader context of the statement? What is the speaker arguing for or against?

Once you provide more information, I can give you a more specific and helpful response.