What the statement means:
* Perfectibility of Man: This refers to the belief that humans have the potential to become morally and intellectually perfect, through education, societal improvement, and self-development.
* No Dedication: This implies a lack of commitment and passion to the craft of writing.
* No Membership in Literature: This suggests the writer's work lacks the qualities that define literature, like artistic merit, depth, and engagement with universal human experiences.
The Problem with the Statement:
* Overly Prescriptive: It suggests a rigid, absolute requirement for writers. Many great writers have explored a wide range of perspectives, including those that question the perfectibility of man.
* Unrealistic Ideal: The notion of human perfection is a complex and often debated topic. It's an ideal that is rarely achievable.
* Limited View of Literature: Literature encompasses a vast spectrum of themes, styles, and perspectives. To exclude writers who don't adhere to a specific belief system is to narrow the definition of what constitutes literature.
What's More Important:
Instead of focusing on a singular belief, here's what truly matters for a writer:
* Authenticity: Writing from a genuine and honest perspective.
* Skill and Craft: Mastering the art of storytelling, language, and form.
* Engagement: Creating works that resonate with readers on an emotional, intellectual, or spiritual level.
* Curiosity and Openness: Exploring different ideas, perspectives, and experiences.
Conclusion:
The statement is too limiting and misses the point of literature. Writers, like any artist, should strive to be authentic, skilled, and engaging. The belief in human perfectibility is not a prerequisite for being a dedicated member of the literary world.